Anyone noticing a widening gap between regular and premium fuel?

Discussion in 'The Bench' started by Brian Albrecht, Mar 18, 2024.

  1. 436'd Skylark

    436'd Skylark Sweet Fancy Moses!!!!!

    It was a Sunoco station where I used to buy the 94. No idea if it was exclusive to them..
     
  2. LARRY70GS

    LARRY70GS a.k.a. "THE WIZARD" Staff Member

    Yes, premium pump fuel (still 93 octane here), is about 70-80 cents more per gallon, but the only car that needs it is my GS, and I don't drive it enough for it to matter. The only time I take a hit with gasoline is when I buy 15 gallons of ethanol free gasoline just to get me through Winter storage. There are only 2 or 3 stations on Long Island that sell it, and they can charge what they want. The rest of the season, I use pump E10 at seasonal pricing .
    EthanolFuel2.jpg
    My daily Driver 2023 Honda Accord Hybrid takes 87, and gets 50 MPG.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 19, 2024
    chiefsb30 likes this.
  3. dynaflow

    dynaflow shiftless...

    ...I haven't bought a DD that requires premium for decades, and unless Owner's Manual specifically states premium (think warranty), most computer-controlled engines will tune to grade...
     
    TORQUED455 likes this.
  4. Quick Buick

    Quick Buick Arlington Wa

    Correct.....
     
  5. Quick Buick

    Quick Buick Arlington Wa

    If it wasn't for the factI have multiple vehicles + fuel cans on one card to purchase Diesel, non ethanols 87 & 91 .
    The odometer option would be cool... For instance 1 vehicle only. Mileage + gallons = MPGs on the paper bill that I get every 2 weeks or so.
     
  6. John Codman

    John Codman Platinum Level Contributor

    Neither have I. The only vehicle that I own that requires premium fuel is the Buchev. The Magnum RT Manual says that the mid-grade is recommended, but you can run 87 but with "reduced performance." It will do everything that I need it to on regular, and that's what it gets.
     
  7. Quick Buick

    Quick Buick Arlington Wa

    My 92 caprice. TBI 305.... If I use ethanol 87 I loose 5 MPG. If I use ethanol 92 I loose 3 MPG on my daily run-around... I run 87 CORNless I get 19 on am daily run-around and up to 28 on the open highway...
     
  8. red67wildcat

    red67wildcat Well-Known Member

    mid 20+
    premium 60+
    here in Washington
     
  9. D STAGE 2 455

    D STAGE 2 455 Well-Known Member

    The race fuel I use in the Caddy cost $9.99 a gallon also, but it's 112 octane. I use Sunoco 94 in my
    Ford Flex(ecoboost) probably my quickest daily driver yet.
     
  10. 66electrafied

    66electrafied Just tossing in my nickel's worth

    Premium has always been expensive up here in Canada, and it's the biggest reason I sold the Electra. Add to that the fact that it's all got ethanol in it now, which makes it bad for any of the older engines. The Electra hated ethanol, it would gum up the carb. So, at about $8 a gallon (give or take) and an average of around 15 mpg, it just became a losing proposition.
     
  11. Fox's Den

    Fox's Den 355Xrs

    Gas has always been the biggest cost and most money spent per month and especially if you like to cruise around, guess that is out now.
    This is like the days when/if youhad a 12.1 engine and needed all race gas to run it . That car if you had it did not cruise that much, but back then the race gas was $3.00 a gal That was only 30 yrs ago. Now regular gas is that much..barely
     
  12. gs66

    gs66 Silver Level contributor

    Raising the spreads was done consciously to improve margins. Someone thought Premium buyers were less price sensitive so this raise was used to gain profits. I was in some of the meetings when this was discussed. I worked in the convenience store industry for 45 years. Unfortunately most of our stuff takes Premium.
     
  13. knucklebusted

    knucklebusted Well-Known Member

    And they all laughed at me for leaving some power on the table for building my engines for cheap gas! Who's laughing now?
     
  14. LARRY70GS

    LARRY70GS a.k.a. "THE WIZARD" Staff Member

    Greg,
    If I am not mistaken, you drive both cars more than most, so most definitely the way to go.
     
    knucklebusted likes this.
  15. Brian Albrecht

    Brian Albrecht Classic Reflections

    I was afraid that was the issue. Soak the "rich"
     
  16. 73 Stage-1

    73 Stage-1 Dave

    It’s more like “soak anyone we can.”
     
    436'd Skylark and DaWildcat like this.
  17. Ken Mild

    Ken Mild King of 18 Year Resto's

    When was the last time a 3rd party tested the actual octane at the pumps? There was a time back in the 70's or 80's where some news station tested some and found the higher octane ratings were BS. To be fair, that was back when the mob had controls over various stations. But I still feel that it can be BS here and there. Maybe not everywhere. But hey, human nature is what it is. And if a company can easily fleece you with no repercussions (I mean, who is gonna test octane levels?), they will do it. I know some people make this judgement by whether or not they can "hear" or "feel" the performance difference. Whatever.
     
  18. DaWildcat

    DaWildcat Platinum Level Contributor

    A good writeup about your question regarding third party auditing/testing, including detergents and other additives besides octane:

    https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_fuelqualityBP_nov2011.pdf

    Devon
     
    Kingfish likes this.
  19. Ken Mild

    Ken Mild King of 18 Year Resto's

    Thanks Devon. Long article. Did a quick search on "octane" just to see if there was end user location testing of fuel but didn't find anything specific to that. I was just looking for some kind of quality control regarding octane claims but while looking, found out that one of the main funding sources for this "independent" council ICCT, is; ClimateWorks Foundation is a San Francisco-based nonprofit organization founded in 2008.[1] ClimateWorks Foundation's mission is to slow global warming by funding other organizations internationally to help find best practice solutions to cut down on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions .[1]

    What a tangled web.
     
  20. DaWildcat

    DaWildcat Platinum Level Contributor

    It is.

    Mentioned on page 15, US/Japan/UK testing:

    But that may be at the refinery only. I think the States take care of gas station tests.

    FYI, if I remember right, ASTM D2699 (Research number) and D2700 (Motor) standards can only determine within 0.7 points, so we're talking about almost +/- 1 point tolerance.

    Devon
     

Share This Page