340 engine good or bad

Discussion in 'Wrenchin' Secrets' started by twenty, Sep 14, 2010.

  1. twenty

    twenty Member

    I have a 66 skylark with orginal 340 eng in it. was thinking of beefing it up, but have been steered away due to cost. is this true? will it cost thousands to get the engine over 450 horsepower? or should i go with the 455 motor?

    ok tomorrow i am going to pick up the 455 motor with turbo trans for $400.00 for both. now i will need to redo everything but the engine is not locked up and has great compression. based on the answers below i think this is the best route.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2010
  2. pphil

    pphil Well-Known Member

    it will also cost thousands to get there with a 455


    just my 2 cents worth

    scott
     
  3. Joe65SkylarkGS

    Joe65SkylarkGS 462 ina 65 Lark / GN

    I will gladly trade you the 340 for a 68 430 big block?? Complete engine.
     
  4. william.ali.kay

    william.ali.kay Needs more cowbell!

    I vote for keeping theoriginal motor and beefing it up along the way.
    Its not going to be cheap to get that kind of power no matter which motor you go with.
    You could always throw a turbo(or two) on that 340. :)
     
  5. jay3000

    jay3000 RIP 1-16-21

    It will cost thousands to get there with turbos too.. About 5 of them give or take. But that's cheap for the amount of fun and Bling.. There is no way you could have this much fun with a NA car..
     
  6. BUICKRAT

    BUICKRAT Got any treats?

    I have a 340 and an st300 trans I don't need, pm me.
     
  7. Nothingface5384

    Nothingface5384 Detail To Oil - Car Care

    I say keep it, as it has the same stroke as a buick 350, and the new TA rover heads will bolt up so more options down the road!

    you can add a supercharger or turbo for a really nice fun factor
     
  8. Stampy

    Stampy Well-Known Member

    The 340 was only offered in 66 and 67- its basically an overbored Buick 300. Parts are going to be hard to find for it. In my opinion, it doesn't really make enough power to move a Skylark safely. Gas mileage paired with the ST300 is going to be absolutely dreadful as well, 8-9 MPG when you baby it, worse if you get your foot in it at all.

    If you ask me, I'd say go for a transplant. Something bigger, with a better transmission. Doug Ray should be selling a 401 out of a numbers matching 66 GranSport any day now. :rant: (its not his fault, don't shoot the messenger). If I wasn't already knee deep in 455 parts, I'd be lining up for that one for my '66.
     
  9. Mr Big

    Mr Big Silver Level contributor

    If it's performance you're after don't waste time and $ on the 340...
     
  10. rmstg2

    rmstg2 Gold Level Contributor

    I beg to differ with you on the mileage with a 340. I had one in a LaSabre that would get 19 MPG all day long at 65 MPH. Not a hotrod but it would get up to freeway speed with ease. Good engine in my book.

    Bob H.
     
  11. Opelsauce

    Opelsauce Well-Known Member

    Also wrong is that the 340 is a 300 with a LARGER bore. Not so. The 300 and 340 have the same bore (3.75). As mentioned earlier, the 340 and 350 share a long stroke (3.85) vs the
    300's 3.36. Throwing a big block in there would be the cheapest way to go for a quick increase in power.
    ---Jim
     
  12. dynaflow

    dynaflow shiftless...

    Especially if you did "nothing" to the replacement...
     
  13. Mark Demko

    Mark Demko Well-Known Member

    I think the 340 would have plenty of power for a Skylark, hell they put 'em LeSabres. Getting 450 hp outta one isnt going to be easy or cheap:shock:
     
  14. Joe65SkylarkGS

    Joe65SkylarkGS 462 ina 65 Lark / GN

    Steve New Hampshire is not too far. Let me know the details via PM??
     
  15. twenty

    twenty Member

    Thanks to all that responded. i think i am going to keep my 340 in the garage (until my wife puts us out) :shock: and get the 455 motor and trans. my mechanic gave me some great pros and cons to doing the transplant. the pros being of course the torque that the 455 offers and the cons being the size and weight. If anyone has any extra parts for the 455 please email me. i am willing to pay for shipping. :dollar:
     
  16. twenty

    twenty Member

    i am intersted in the trade. i am in chicago. let me know if you are intersested.
     
  17. Opelsauce

    Opelsauce Well-Known Member

    As far as weight goes...The 455 is only a little heavier than a 350 chevy. And if you replace that stock intake with something aluminum, it's actually lighter! Engine mounts, headers, etc. are available from TA Perf.
    ---Jim
     
  18. Joe65SkylarkGS

    Joe65SkylarkGS 462 ina 65 Lark / GN

    Chicago huh? Thats pretty far dude.
     

Share This Page