I think it has to do with the market already being covered by Edelbrock. Unless TA was to make a dual plane that was greatly improved from the B4B and the Performer, then I wouldn't think it'd be in their favor to put the $$$ into it. Now, my question is, why did Edelbrock bring back the B4B when they already have the Performer?
hey adam wassup! if they were to do an intake with an airgap such as their spx but with the dual plane design there would be an advantage with the cool air charge straight away. and i know if they did do an air gap i would be first on the list :TU: :Brow: ......and i would show edelbrock my :moonu: !
