Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right.

Discussion in 'Street/strip 400/430/455' started by NZ GS 400, Jan 23, 2017.

  1. Grum.Man

    Grum.Man Well-Known Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Yea that's it. 420 hp with basically the same build with the exception of intake and headers though he has a cam in the middle between the 212 and 413. Either the timing isn't set up correctly or the iron intake and exhaust is really killing it.
     
  2. LARRY70GS

    LARRY70GS a.k.a. "THE WIZARD" Staff Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Could also be the head flow. Like TA Mike said, not everyone can do the Stage1 conversion properly. You could actually hurt flow. we also don't know the Static and Dynamic compression.
     
  3. alan

    alan High-tech Dinosaur

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    When larger valves are installed, doesn't the chamber area around the intake need to be machined to unshroud the valve?
     
  4. LARRY70GS

    LARRY70GS a.k.a. "THE WIZARD" Staff Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Yes. That is the question. Was it done correctly in this case?

    http://www.buickperformanceclub.com/455hdcompare.htm
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2017
  5. 70 gsconvt

    70 gsconvt Silver Level contributor

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Those are almost exactly the same numbers I got for my car on a chassis dyno. Although my HP peaked around 5000 rpm's. I was a bit disappointed.

    But after seeing the numbers posted by others, particularly Chevy/Ford/MOPAR guys, and seeing their times in the quarter mile (many in the 12's and 13's) I'm satisfied.

    As long as the car hooks good, you'll have plenty of smiles on the street and on the track.
     
  6. NZ GS 400

    NZ GS 400 Gold Level Contributor

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Thank you very much for all of your input. I am going to get the needed information and I will give you an update.

    You have given me the talking points I was looking for that I need to bring up with the shop. Much appreciated!
     
  7. BuickGSrules

    BuickGSrules Gold Level Contributor

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Numbers looks like he has calculated with 20% drivetrain loss.
     
  8. 87GN_70GS

    87GN_70GS Well-Known Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    What was the cam degreed to? Or was it degreed?

    What was the final timing?
     
  9. Bens99gtp

    Bens99gtp Well-Known Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    I had a set of small valve heads that John Z did some work to focusing of keeping high air velocity. A stk bottom end motor these heads and a hemi killer cam, and an offy 360 intake and edelbrock 750 carb ran 11.80s, had the valve changed out to stage1 car went 12.20s. The just bowl hogged and fit the valves. They messed it up so bad John just did another set cause it was easier than fixing the mistake.
     
  10. 8ad-f85

    8ad-f85 Well-Known Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    The OP has already stated that he might be mistaken about the rpm at hp peak.
    It's probably 5000 rpm, that would fall in line appropriately with the torque # and appears to be close to a factory engine, correction calcs notwithstanding.
    It's already been stated that it takes more than 'just cutting seats to fit larger valves' to show an actual benefit.
    I see this as blameless so far and maybe that expectations could have been honed in on with more communication up front.
     
  11. NZ GS 400

    NZ GS 400 Gold Level Contributor

    Update: I got some numbers

    Ok, here is some more info:

    See Dyno Print out.

    Static compression: 10.1:1 (gasket compressed thickness .041, deck height .01055)gasket (.041)


    Dynamic Compression (according to my calculations): 7.21:1
    Camshaft was not degreed.
    Edit: I am wondering about the static compression. According to the Wallace Racing calculator, it seems like it should be 10.34:1 given the above numbers?

    dyno sheet.jpg
     
  12. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Looks like it made pretty much what it should have,....
     
  13. Jim Rodgers

    Jim Rodgers Well-Known Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Agree. I just wonder if they put the cam in straight up or if they advanced it and how the distributor is set up.
     
  14. NZ GS 400

    NZ GS 400 Gold Level Contributor

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Thanks Hugger. Do you think I should consider bumping up my static compression (thinner head gasket) a point for more power? Would 11:1 static compression still be ok with pump gas 94 octane?
     
  15. LARRY70GS

    LARRY70GS a.k.a. "THE WIZARD" Staff Member

    Re: Update: I got some numbers

    Without degreeing the cam, there is no way to know if it is in right. If your static compression was truly 10.1:1, and the cam was installed at 108* ICL, then your DCR would be 7.52. The heads are also questionable. The good news is you can save up for some TA aluminum heads, which depending on your current combustion chamber size, might give you more static compression. The better head flow should give you at least 50 HP or better according to the TA catalog.
     
  16. LARRY70GS

    LARRY70GS a.k.a. "THE WIZARD" Staff Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    I don't think you could achieve 11:1 SCR. The only thinner gasket would be the steel shim gaskets at .020, that would net you 10.57:1 or so. That would bring the DCR up to 7.84, again, assuming your cam is in correctly.
     
  17. NZ GS 400

    NZ GS 400 Gold Level Contributor

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Thanks Larry,

    With that being said in combination with your earlier post, would you recommend that I have the shop go back and degree the cam? I am not sure of the implications, I need to do more reading to learn.

     
  18. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Checking cam timing certainly couldn't hurt, your not going to find 50hp there, and no don't go upping compression with Iron heads, just put it in put some miles on it to see if the bottom end is a durable piece and then put some TA heads and a more aggressive stick in one weekend then you will be where you want be, or think you should be
     
  19. LARRY70GS

    LARRY70GS a.k.a. "THE WIZARD" Staff Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    If it was my engine, I'd want to know. To properly degree the cam, you'll need a crank gear with multiple key ways. Did you use one? If you use a stock gear set, there is no way to adjust it if it isn't in right.
     
  20. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    Re: Disappointing Dyno Numbers -- I need advice please! I think something isn't right

    Good point, if it just a single keyway it is what is, I bet that's why it's straight up because there was no other option
     

Share This Page