Chevy engine

Discussion in 'The Bench' started by doc, Dec 10, 2004.

  1. doc

    doc Well-Known Member

    How many out there know that Chevrolet has NEVER produced a 396 cu.in. eng????? :Brow:
     
  2. Yardley

    Yardley Club Jackass

  3. CJay

    CJay Supercar owner Staff Member

    I believe it was a 396 until the 1970 model year. From 1970 on it was actually 402 cubic inches.
     
  4. Brad Conley

    Brad Conley RIP Staff Member

    Sure they did...1965 (late introduction) until 1969. After that is was a 402 cid as per the others above.
     
  5. Yardley

    Yardley Club Jackass

    What was changed? Bore? Stroke?
     
  6. CJay

    CJay Supercar owner Staff Member

    bored .030 oversize. Added 6 cubes to the engine. I guess "SS 396" souned cooler than "SS 402" to Chevrolet.

    C- change
    H- heads
    E- Every
    V- valve
    R- ruined
    O- oil
    L- leaks
    E- every
    T-time
    :laugh: :laugh:
    Jason
     
  7. ricknmel67

    ricknmel67 Well-Known Member

    Ouch
    :pp
    :laugh:
     
  8. doc

    doc Well-Known Member

    396

    I do know that when the tech crew would run the cu. in. test at the drag strip they would always check out to an eaven 400 inches. I read later that the chevy execs liked the phraze "SS 396" and coupled with the 400 in.ban at that time decided to go with that. Kind of like Buick calling a 401 a 400.
     
  9. Topless64-455

    Topless64-455 Well-Known Member

    C=can
    H=hear
    E=every
    V=valve
    R=rattle
    O=on
    L=long
    E=extended
    T=trips

    :eek2: :Smarty:
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2004
  10. NOTNSS

    NOTNSS Gold Level Contributor

    Exactly what they said on American Muscle Car or one of those shows.. 402.
     
  11. painekiller

    painekiller Well-Known Member

    C = CANT
    H = HANDLE
    E = EVEN
    V = VOLKSWAGONS
    Y = YET

    :Do No: :3gears: :Brow: :Dou:
     
  12. btc

    btc Tron Funkin Blow

    Nope, they snuck right under 400 ci fair and square:

    Bore = 4.095"
    Stroke = 3.76"
    4.095 x 4.095 x 0.7854 [<-- pi/4 ] x 3.76 x 8 cylinders = 396.1

    Like a bunch of others said, the later ones had a 4.125" bore, so they were 402's.


    Also, you know the magazines always call a .060 over 454 a "468" ? It's actually a 467. I know it's small and insignificant, but I guess that's why it's always irritated me that they can't get it right.

    4.31 x 4.31 x 0.7854 x 4 x 8 = 466.9
     
  13. buickx

    buickx Well-Known Member

    B

    O

    A

    T


    A

    N

    C

    H

    O

    R

    :moonu:
     
  14. Carl Rychlik

    Carl Rychlik Let Buick Light Your Fire

    If you have to run a Chevy big block,427 is the way to go. 396's were ok,but the 427 was much better.

    The only exception to the 396,was the L-78 which was rated at 375 hp,but power output was around 425 hp. Those L-78's were good running engines.
     
  15. 10sec 455

    10sec 455 Well-Known Member

    Ya, the Buick 455 is much better! Except the weak mains, lifter valley, large mains, aluminum oil pump housing, small cam journals, thin cylinder walls, no forged crankshafts, non adjustable valve train, and rope seals! I love my Buick because they are different and powerful. I just cant stand when people knock a greatly designed engine. When Chevrolet Designed the small and big blocks they had their sh-t together. Some engines are "boat anchors" but not this one, 396-375hp was a great engine.
    Jeff
     
  16. GKMoz

    GKMoz Gary / Moz

    L-78

    Had one of these in my 71 chevelle SS, That was one awesome motor !!
     
  17. APVGS

    APVGS Ottawa Go Fast Guy!!

    Hey Guys.Chevy big blocks are pretty good engines all around.I don`t think the 396-325 h.p (base engine)was a very hot package. :boring:This was what 60-70% of the Chevelles probably came with.The L78 with solid lifters and 780 Holley proved to be the "Real" 396.Other than that the SS396 Chevelle is a bit over rated IMHO.In the late 70`s I street raced a few with my 340 Dart and had no problem being the victor!! :grin: Later,Tony.
     

Share This Page