430 vs. 455

Discussion in 'V-8 Buick Powered Regals' started by 87regal455, Mar 3, 2009.

  1. 87regal455

    87regal455 Mike C.

    Hi guys this choice is keeping me up tonight. I need some help in figuring out what I should do.

    I have a 73 455 in good running shape. I also have an chance to trade a carbed 3.8 that I have to a guy for a good running 67 buick 430. Which ever one I pick it will be going into an 87 regal. Both engines are stock and the only mods that I plan to do right now is a cam swap and drive besides taking the smog stuff off of the 455.

    Here is my question. Which engine would have more hp and torque in stock form and are there any pros or cons to using each.

    My thought is that the 430 would give me the most right now and I can leave the 455 on the shelf until I am ready for the hopup rebuild.

    Also if I go with the 430 could I use the hei distributor from the 455.

    Decisions Decisions but I know that you guys can help me out with this one. Thanks.
     
  2. bob k. mando

    bob k. mando Guest

    67 will have the one year only high flow exh manifold and probably has the big port heads, both of which could eventually be put onto the 455.

    the 430 will definitely have the small combustion chamber, may require premium gas.

    the 67 430 was rated at 360hp/475tq, the 71 455 ( which was the last year rated in Gross ) was rated at 345hp/460tq in the Riv. 72 and 73 show the same ratings ( 270hp/390tq ) and i think most of the drop from 71 to 72 was because of the change from Gross to Net, not an actual drop in output.

    upshot is, i think the 430 will run a little better and it's got the added benefit of having cheap go-fast parts you can put on your 455.
     
  3. 70sLark

    70sLark Well-Known Member

    430 will have a bit more rare cool factor, being the 455 in that body style was the mod of choice across the brands, using an Olds or Buick 455.
     
  4. flynbuick

    flynbuick Guest

  5. 87regal455

    87regal455 Mike C.

    Guys thanks for the information and if anyone else has anything to offer then please keep it coming. I didn't think that the numbers would be as close as what you all are saying.

    I guess really the only benefit for going with the 430 is a few hp and torque, that I probably will not be able to feel, but I will be able to ride with the 430 while I save up money for the TA SE heads and rebuild.
     
  6. flynbuick

    flynbuick Guest

    Those future TA heads will not help you on the 430 because of the smaller bore. It is money wasted unless you appply those to a 455.
     
  7. DaWildcat

    DaWildcat Platinum Level Contributor

    Jim, I think he's only planning the TA heads for the future 455 build.

    Regardless, the 430 would still love the TA heads, especially with port work. The gains come from chamber and port design improvements, not just valve diameters. Even though the bores may shroud the valves a bit, it certainly didn't stop a friend from knocking almost a half second off his 436 Regal with that head swap alone, and he didn't bother notching the cylinder bores for valve relief the way I did my 436 a long time back. His SE heads were out of the box with only some port matching, too.

    Devon
     
  8. flynbuick

    flynbuick Guest

    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 4, 2009
  9. 87regal455

    87regal455 Mike C.

    The TA heads would definitely be going on the 455. There is no replacement for displacement with all things being equal.
     
  10. DaWildcat

    DaWildcat Platinum Level Contributor


    If anyone cares, here's the trick to help improve that situation:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]





    Factory did this on the Ford 427 for high-riser heads, and Vizard recommends the trick, too.

    Devon
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2009
  11. Joe Kelsch

    Joe Kelsch Eat Mo' Rats

    Here's a pic of the 67 manifolds compared to the 68-76 ones. The 67's are on the bottom.

    [​IMG]
     
  12. 87regal455

    87regal455 Mike C.

    kinda makes you wonder why buick changed the design on the manifolds when they seem to have gotten it right the first time.
     
  13. 70sLark

    70sLark Well-Known Member

    Engineers cant leave well enough alone and a penny pincher in accounting didnt stop it.
     
  14. DaWildcat

    DaWildcat Platinum Level Contributor

    Looks to me like a cost save drove the change. The later manifolds seem to have a simpler core design that may have sped up manufacturing cycle times overall. Probably another design/process deemed "too expensive" like the variable pitch stator.

    Devon
     

Share This Page