1964 Skylark solid bushing control arm shaft vs. newer style

Discussion in 'The whoa and the sway.' started by sd-slider, Aug 10, 2015.

  1. sd-slider

    sd-slider Blue Skies!

    I am getting ready to put the 64 back together and due to price and availability, had decided to track down a "newer" set of front upper control arms.

    The existing arms use the solid rubber like the ones on the left in this pic:
    Over_View_001.jpg

    What are the advantages, if any, to having this style versus the newer ones?

    =Eric
     
  2. philbquick

    philbquick Founders Club Member

    I was always of the opinion that the change to rubber bushings was for the sake of cost reduction. One advantage to the rubber is it may transfer less road noise to the frame. A disadvantage is the bushing is 1.5 inches away from the exhaust manifold which causes them to rot. I like the metal ones.
     
  3. 64 skylark mike

    64 skylark mike Well-Known Member

    I replaced mine like those about 3 years ago. I got the replacements through NAPA. They got them in a couple days. Since then I have found them cheaper in a couple other places.

    Here's one vendor...

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Replace...964|Model:Skylark&hash=item542237ae8c&vxp=mtr

    I like the fact that they have grease fittings on them. I don't know if it actually makes any difference, but it seems like a good design to me. I was told that if you change to the newer style you need the newer control arms too. But check that with the knowledgeable guys on the board.
     
  4. philbquick

    philbquick Founders Club Member

    That is correct!
     
  5. sd-slider

    sd-slider Blue Skies!

    Thanks guys!

    I will definately want the least amount of rubber since at least a 3" downpipe will be running down right above it.

    I'll keep 'em for the interim and see how she rides...and how long they last next to the downpipe.

    =Eric
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2015

Share This Page