1970 GSX Michigan

Discussion in 'Cars and Parts For Sale Leads' started by flh73, Nov 19, 2020.

  1. flh73

    flh73 Gold Level Contributor

  2. Doo Wop

    Doo Wop Where were you in '62?

    Pretty hefty price for a NOM.
     
    no1oldsfan likes this.
  3. CJay

    CJay Supercar owner Staff Member

    71/72 radiator top plate. And small diameter AC pully for starters
     
  4. BUQUICK

    BUQUICK I'm your huckleberry.

    The owner is an active board member here on V8buick.
     
    Dano and OHC JOE like this.
  5. BUQUICK

    BUQUICK I'm your huckleberry.

    I do not know the production date of this car, but toward the end of the ‘70 model year cars began leaving the Flint factory with the 2-hole cover. So there are documented, original ‘70 models with a 2-hole cover. It was carried from late ‘70 until early ‘72. Then Buick switched to the 4-hole version for the remaining (and majority) of the ‘72 production run.


    I put photos of the 5 different radiator covers used from ‘70-‘72 in this thread but you have to scroll down a bit to see the post and photos:

    http://www.v8buick.com/index.php?threads/plastic-vs-metal-radiator-cover.321133/#post-2680099
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2020
    Dano and Stage 2 iron like this.
  6. Stage 2 iron

    Stage 2 iron Platinum Level Contributor

    Pretty sure it was an April bill date on that X he shows the fender build dates
     
  7. no1oldsfan

    no1oldsfan Well-Known Member

    No Lie. 90k for a non numbers matching car? No offense meant but. 90k to me is a 100 percent original motor sheet metal etc car. That kind of cash is the value of a car with all that.
     
  8. Dano

    Dano Platinum Level Contributor

    It does say "asking" so he is open to an offer.

    So what is a reasonable price for an NOM/non-Stage/Auto. but restored/done and seemingly (according to what the owner told me) pretty darn nice GSX that maybe needs a few minor things corrected?

    Not that I'm in the market but if I was, I'd love to have it.
     
    charlierogers likes this.
  9. Hawken

    Hawken Hawken

    As the ad states it documented to be '70 GSX #318, that would probably be a build date of late March and early/mid April-ish, I believe.
     
    Dano likes this.
  10. no1oldsfan

    no1oldsfan Well-Known Member

    The car is beautiful for sure.
    In these covid times getting high dollar isn't as easy as previous times.
    What is a reasonable price lately for these cars? Any gone to auction this year?
     
  11. no1oldsfan

    no1oldsfan Well-Known Member

  12. BUQUICK

    BUQUICK I'm your huckleberry.


    A restored '70 GSX 455 non-Stage 1, auto, A/C sold at Mecum Indy in July 2020 for $79,200 The description does not state if it is matching numbers engine, which to me implies that is was not matching numbers. Otherwise the auction house would have bragged about it.
     
    Dano likes this.
  13. Dano

    Dano Platinum Level Contributor

    Was that plus or inclusive of buyer's premium?
     
  14. Redmanf1

    Redmanf1 Gold Level Contributor

    04D
    54K miles

    With premium, Non matching numbers and it was a white car. The white cars never seem to bring as much money.

     
    BUQUICK and Dano like this.
  15. marc1

    marc1 Well-Known Member

    I have asked about the number matching aspect previously in the original thread on the Apollo White GSX in question, this source below clearly states it was number matching. Does anyone know the real truth about this car? It is critical to know for correct real world valuation of these vehicles.

    https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Events/Event/Details/1970-BUICK-GSX-212463

    Currently my understanding is that White GSX (446370H277685) was numbers, even though it wasn't mentioned in the final two actions last summer (Vannoy and Indy), based upon the detail in the 2018 auction. I agree that, in general, if the number matching language is missing from an ad that usually implies it is not number matching but that is not a guarantee.
     
  16. BUQUICK

    BUQUICK I'm your huckleberry.

    Buyer paid $79,200 = $72,000 hammer + $7,200 (10%) buyers premium

    I agree that a white car will not bring the same as a yellow one. The yellow GSX is a nice car and I think the price is appropriate.
     
    Dano likes this.
  17. TORQUED455

    TORQUED455 Well-Known Member

    Check out the avatars in the respondents in this thread.
     
  18. BUQUICK

    BUQUICK I'm your huckleberry.

    :)
     
  19. Redmanf1

    Redmanf1 Gold Level Contributor

    From my understanding there were issues from the first purchase regarding the "original engine". There is a reason it was not stated as such in the last two sales.
    My guess is someone took that it was accidently not mentioned in the sale from Vannoy and that is why the quick turnover.. You would need to ask the last seller that.
    Do you think that an auction like Mecum would not post such important info if it could remotely be proven. This especially since it was posted numbers matching for the other GSX? No way it was missed and twice at that..

    The Vannoy yellow GSX Sold with fees $140.800.00
    Something must have happened on the sale with the White GSX as it is removed from the Vannoy collection sale???? Must be why it was sold in indy a couple weeks later W fees $79,200.00 and another 70 GSX yellow stage 1 auto sold W fees $154,000.00



     
    BUQUICK likes this.

Share This Page