Looks nice in this color combo.. https://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/dealer/buick/century/2058431.html?refer=saturday#&gid=1&pid=5
IF yours was as nice Fred, IF you still had it, could be part of the retirement plan. Still wish I had most of the cars I've have sold or otherwise. Problem is where to keep them all. Tom T.
Love the exterior combination but what were they thinking with that color interior, way off from factory unless the photo hue is off. It's way too bright of a blue
In 1960 , went to look at a 55 century conv same color on a used car lot, I was driving a 56 special 2dr. The car wouldn't start, Guy said "it run great , just need some tender loving care " . Lifted the hood to check it out. NO air cleaner and the hood padding over the carb ( just over the carb ) was GONE ! Old Buicks don't run well on hood insolation. Let that one go ! Bill
So did I. But I was 18. I regretted selling it within two weeks and I still do. As to the OP, That car looks very nice, but it isn't a 100 point car. I checked Concept Carz prices and here's what I found: in 2007 one sold for $101,200; in 2008 one sold for $69,300, and in 2011 another brought $70,000. Since the 2011 sale the highest price paid (these are actual selling prices) was $51,700. Draw your own conclusions.
I wasn't crazy about the interior colors either. My '55 Century ragtop didn't mix the seat colors - it was solid red leather. I don't think the dash in the OP car is correct either. Mine was black - but so was the car. I don't believe that the purplish blue was a factory color.
On colors, compare the outdoor photo of the car and the dash and visor color to body color, much closer. Interior photos of seats is taken inside a garage where probably under fluorescent light and turns it purple. My $0.02